|
Hi Tom, just 2 questions
|
|
07-20-2010, 12:32 PM
Post: #1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Tom, just 2 questions
Hi Tom
Question 1 When you make mention of no failed fifths, do you mean no failed fifths with regard to the extreme of 3 or the low of the RTB that has passed the extreme of 3. Below Ive posted a chart which I hope describes what I have said here a little better. I guess what Im trying to ask is, can the RTB be the low of the wave. FAILED 5.jpg (Size: 10.26 KB / Downloads: 88)
And then question 2. Your rule states that in every c wave and every 5th wave there will be a 4th wave with a B wave that sets new price territory. The only way I can visualize this B wave you are mentioning is by the drawing below. Is it that black B in the 4th wave that you are talking about ??? I sure hope so or its back to the drawing board for me ![]() |
|||
|
07-20-2010, 02:10 PM
Post: #2
|
|||
|
|||
| RE: Hi Tom, just 2 questions | |||
|
07-20-2010, 03:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-20-2010 04:02 PM by ruby.)
Post: #3
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Hi Tom, just 2 questions
White A is correct.
Black 5 within white rtb should be black a. Black A within white rtb should be black b. Black B is in fact black C of white rtb. Black C should be white C, or as you posted correctly, white 4. End of wave 5 is always the wave's extreme. I reshorted the Dow 5 minutes before the bell - so knowing the rules and applying them correctly are two different things. But then again, it was better than shorting at the bottom this morning :-) Oops, sorry - I'm not Tom. I hope you don't mind. |
|||
|
07-20-2010, 08:11 PM
Post: #4
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Hi Tom, just 2 questions
(07-20-2010 12:32 PM)spike1 Wrote: Hi Tom The RTB must at least be matched by wave 5. Neither the terminal of a 3rd nor of the B of an RTB 4th can ever be the furthest price movement reached of any motive wave. Quote:And then question 2. Your drawing shows the right understanding.
TS Hennessy |
|||
|
07-21-2010, 06:29 AM
Post: #5
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Hi Tom, just 2 questions
Objection!
The shape is correct, but the wave internals are not. White rtB is a B wave, composed of a-b-c, not a-a-b. Or it's back to the drawing board for everyone here. |
|||
|
07-21-2010, 03:54 PM
Post: #6
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Hi Tom, just 2 questions
Hi guys, thanks for the reply. So this is what I ve got.
The 5th wave will be the extreme or equal to the RTB always. The previous drawing shows the right understanding however the internal count appears to be wrong. So I think I see where Rudy is comming from. Please feel free to correct and thank you for taking the time here with regards to helping me achieve a better understanding of this rule. Take care ![]() |
|||
|
07-31-2010, 02:28 AM
Post: #7
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Hi Tom, just 2 questions
spike,
Until someone else gets back to you I will have to do - note I am not rated as an active member. Now focus on the black C in the white RTB. You have for ease of construction I assume, shown it as an exact copy of the black A - it covers those that are reasonably alike as well. One is an A and the other a C, so they are both fives but the latter contains an RTB 4th. What possibility does open up for where the yellow 4 ends, compared to the yellow 3, in the black C wave? IMO it essential that you understand the difference between the roles of the subwaves in a non-RTB 4th and an RTB 4th. cheers theory |
|||
|
07-31-2010, 03:11 PM
Post: #8
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Hi Tom, just 2 questions
Yes TM, it's a jungle out there, disorder and confusion everywhere, no one seems to care ...
|
|||
|
08-01-2010, 03:33 AM
Post: #9
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Hi Tom, just 2 questions
(07-31-2010 03:11 PM)ruby Wrote: Yes TM, it's a jungle out there, disorder and confusion everywhere, no one seems to care ... Read those words and thought, "Hey, I think I know where they are from." Great song, the lyric does reflect how I think when I'm trading. My favourite bit in Monk was when he visited a woman and looked in her garage. There was a place for everything and everything was in its place - the look of joy on his face was brilliant. cheers theory |
|||
|
08-01-2010, 07:41 AM
(This post was last modified: 08-01-2010 07:41 AM by ruby.)
Post: #10
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Hi Tom, just 2 questions
TM, this thread is not the best place to discuss the issue, but it’s good that you can laugh about yourself. – Well, I think it’s good, based on my own neurotic style of dealing with the one existential vcccccccc (that was my cat) question. If you want to, you can open a new thread in that sunset-section.
Do you know “The Eye of Edna” by E.B. White? |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread: | Author | Replies: | Views: | Last Post | |
| Tom, two questions for you. | theoryman | 3 | 565 |
11-27-2010 04:05 PM Last Post: TS Hennessy |
|

Search
Calendar
Help





